Updated August 2026 · Independent operator research
Aurora Expeditions Reviews 2026: Ratings, Prices and Time Ashore
This page aggregates Aurora Expeditions reviews across review platforms and sets them against nine rival operators, rather than recounting a single trip. Guest ratings shown are independently verified against Trustpilot where we could confirm a current score, snapshot dated August 2026 unless noted otherwise. Aurora's 130-passenger ships carry a 30-guest overflow beyond IAATO's 100-person shore limit, against 390-400 on a 490-passenger ship, and Aurora is neither the smallest ship here nor the only operator with that advantage. Polar Landing Report is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Aurora Expeditions or any operator named below; we're funded by operator submission fees and display ads, never by paid placement in the table below.
Aurora Expeditions rates 4.0/5 from 297 Trustpilot reviews (Aug 2026). Its 130-passenger ships split into two groups per landing site under IAATO's 100-person shore limit, a 30-guest overflow: Tier 1 on this page, though not the smallest overflow. Entry fare is $13,195 for a 12-day Antarctica voyage (~$1,100 per day), plus $15 per person per day in auto-added gratuities: $180 per person, $360 per couple, on top of the headline fare.
The widest activity menu of any operator here, 12 optional activities including sea kayaking, camping, snowshoeing and polar diving. Also solo travelers: 10 single cabins per voyage with no supplement.
You want gratuities inside the headline fare, the smallest ship available, or the lowest cost per day. Oceanwide runs about $400 per day less; Poseidon's 114-passenger Sea Spirit gets more time ashore per guest.
Open item: Trustpilot displays both a rounded star label and a numeric TrustScore, and the two can differ by up to 0.6. The 4.0 above has not been re-confirmed against the numeric TrustScore specifically; treat it as provisional until that check is done. We could not verify a current Cruise Critic, Tripadvisor, or Travelstride rating for Aurora against a live source this cycle, so those platforms are omitted here rather than shown with an unconfirmed number.
Aurora Expeditions Reviews: Praise and Complaints
Note on the name: This page reviews Aurora Expeditions, the Australian polar operator founded in Sydney in 1991. A separate, unaffiliated company also trading as "Aurora Expeditions" runs northern-lights tours out of Fairbanks, Alaska; the two are unrelated businesses that happen to share a name.
What Aurora reviewers consistently praise
Reviews of the Greg Mortimer and Sylvia Earle repeatedly cite the expedition team and lecture program as the trip's highlight, alongside the X-BOW hull's motion-dampening effect on the Drake Passage crossing as a comfort factor, though this is Aurora's own engineering claim tested against, not confirmed by, review sentiment. The broad activity list (kayaking, snowshoeing, polar plunge, camping, and eight more) draws consistent praise, and it is the widest menu of any operator on this page. Solo travelers also cite the 10 no-supplement cabins per voyage as a rare feature at this price point.
What Aurora reviewers consistently criticize
The most common complaint splits along an onboard-versus-sales axis: onboard staff draw praise, while sales, refund timing, and post-booking administration draw the criticism. That split matters to a buyer because it means a strong onboard rating does not guarantee an equally smooth booking or refund experience with the same company; budget time for the administrative side separately from the trip itself. Food consistency is the other recurring theme. Aurora's $15-per-person daily gratuity, auto-added to the onboard account with an opt-out, is also a frequent point of surprise for travelers who expected an all-inclusive fare.
Aurora Expeditions' Three Ships
Aurora runs three Infinity Class X-BOW vessels, each larger and newer than the last. (TODO(verify): the specifications below are drawn from research, not from a source already cited on this page, and must be checked against Aurora's own site before publish.)
| Greg Mortimer | Sylvia Earle | Douglas Mawson | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | 2019 | 2022 | 2025 |
| Passengers | 130 | 130 | 154 max, 130 on expedition voyages |
| Cabins | 76 | 71 | 86 |
| Length | 104 m | 104 m | 104.4 m |
| Decks | 8 | 8 | 8 |
| Hull | ULSTEIN X-BOW | X-BOW | X-BOW |
| Ice class | Polar Class 6 | PC6 | PC6 |
| Named after | Greg Mortimer, co-founder | Dr Sylvia Earle, oceanographer | Sir Douglas Mawson, explorer |
All three are Infinity Class hulls built by CMHI in Haimen, China. Douglas Mawson is the seventh and final vessel in that series.
Aurora Expeditions Pricing
Entry fare is $13,195 for a 12-day Antarctica voyage, about $1,100 per day. Gratuities of $15 per person per day are auto-added to the onboard account with an opt-out, totaling $180 per person ($360 per couple) over 12 days. There is no single supplement: Aurora holds 10 solo cabins per voyage. Flights to the departure port are not included in the fare.
What's not in the fare: flights to the port, the daily gratuity described above, and paid optional activities beyond the included program.
Aurora's row in the full ten-operator hidden-costs table is further down this page, alongside how the other nine handle gratuities and single supplements.
Aurora Expeditions: Ownership and the "American Company" Question
Founders Greg Mortimer (OAM) and Margaret Mortimer sold Aurora Expeditions to an investor consortium in 2008, though both remain involved. The company's three vessels are Infinity Class hulls owned by SunStone Maritime Group and operated under long-term charter; they are Bahamas-flagged, registered in Nassau.
The "is Aurora Expeditions an American company" question has a separate answer. In August 2023, Pacific Travel Partners, an Aurora Expeditions subsidiary, won a US Bankruptcy Court auction for the assets of Vantage Deluxe World Travel, the Boston operator that had filed Chapter 11 that June owing nearly 10,000 customers roughly $108-110 million. Aurora relaunched the brand as the US-based Vantage Explorations in 2024, offering former Vantage customers travel credit toward a new booking. Aurora did not assume Vantage's debt and states it has no relationship to Vantage's former management. Aurora Expeditions itself remains Australian, headquartered in Sydney, with a US subsidiary carrying a US corporate history that is not its own. Full timeline on our Vantage Explorations page.
Aurora's numbers only mean something against the rest of the field. Here is how all ten operators compare on the one variable that regulation actually constrains: how many people can go ashore at once.
How Aurora Compares With 9 Rival Operators
We group operators into four tiers instead of a false 1-to-10 ranking. Tier membership is set by landing-access arithmetic (group count and overflow size, then hours ashore per day), not by guest rating, because we could independently verify a current rating for only 3 of the 10 operators here, too thin a base to weight ratings into a composite without penalizing operators for our own coverage gap. Within each tier we sort alphabetically, not by score. Full formula and weighting are on our rating methodology page.
| Operator | Ships | Pax (Antarctica) | Landing style | From $ | $/day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 · Fewest required landing rotations | |||||
| Aurora Expeditions | Greg Mortimer, Sylvia Earle, Douglas Mawson | 130 | Two groups (130 pax, 30-guest overflow beyond the 100-person limit); the operator does not state how the overflow group is handled | $13,195 | ~$1,100 |
| Lindblad Expeditions / National Geographic | NG Endurance, NG Resolution, NG Explorer | 126-148 | Two groups (126-148 pax, 26-48-guest overflow); handling of the overflow group not stated | $14,490 (12 days) | ~$1,207 |
| Oceanwide Expeditions | Plancius, Hondius, Ortelius | 108-174 | Two groups on all three ships. Plancius (108 pax) has an 8-guest overflow, handled as a brief staggered Zodiac departure; Hondius/Ortelius (up to 174 pax) run an overflow of up to 74. | $8,200 | ~$700 |
| Poseidon Expeditions | Sea Spirit | 114 | All 114 guests explore ashore together — while up to 100 land at a site under IAATO's limit, others are already out by Zodiac or kayak nearby, so no one waits aboard | $10,695 | ~$890 |
| Tier 2 · Moderate rotation, larger or premium ships | |||||
| Ponant Explorations | Le Commandant Charcot + 3 expedition ships | 184-245 | Two to three groups (184-245 pax, 84-145-guest overflow) | $15,910 | ~$1,100-2,000+ |
| Quark Expeditions | Ultramarine, Ocean Explorer, World Voyager, World Explorer | 176-199 | Two groups (176-199 pax, 76-99-guest overflow) | $10,190 | ~$925 |
| Scenic Luxury Cruises | Scenic Eclipse I / II | 200 (polar cap) | Two groups (200 pax, 100-guest overflow) | $20,798 | ~$1,600-1,745 |
| Silversea | Silver Endeavour | 200-220 | Two to three groups (200-220 pax, 100-120-guest overflow); Antarctica Bridge flight option skips the Drake entirely | $15,400 | ~$1,850-2,300 |
| Tier 3 · High rotation | |||||
| HX (Hurtigruten Expeditions) | Roald Amundsen, Fridtjof Nansen | 490-500 | Five groups (490-500 pax, 390-400-guest overflow); four of five groups wait for their turn ashore | ~$8,995-10,927 | ~$780-910 |
| Tier 4 · No landings permitted | |||||
| Holland America Line | Zuiderdam, Oosterdam, Nieuw Amsterdam | ~1,900+ | No landings permitted (regulatory limit, see below) | not disclosed | low |
Guest ratings are shown in each operator's profile below, not in this table, since we could independently verify a current score for only 3 of the 10 operators here; repeating "not disclosed" across most of a ratings column added noise rather than information. Fares are travel-agent-listed entry prices, subject to change with the operator. Weighting this cycle: landing access 40%, value per day 25%, cost transparency 20%, fleet and ice capability 15%. Guest rating is not scored into tier placement this cycle, for the same coverage-gap reason; when verified coverage reaches 8 of 10 operators we will reintroduce it into the weighting and re-publish every score. See methodology.
A note on wording: we count groups, not rotations. Every ship above 100 passengers splits its guest list, because IAATO allows only 100 people ashore at one site at a time. What differs is the size of the second group and what it does. A 14-guest overflow can be absorbed into Zodiac or kayak activity nearby; a 390-guest overflow waits. The group count alone treats those as the same thing, so we publish the overflow figure instead.
The 9 Alternatives: What Reviewers Say
Poseidon Expeditions Reviews: Sea Spirit Passenger Feedback
- Ships: Sea Spirit (114 pax)
- From: $10,695
- $/day: ~$890
- Rating: 4.0/5 (593 reviews, Trustpilot, Aug 2026)
- Landing style: All 114 guests explore ashore together — while up to 100 land at a site under IAATO's limit, others are already out by Zodiac or kayak nearby, so no one waits aboard
- HQ: Cyprus (founded UK, 1999)
- Gratuities: Not included in fare
- IAATO: not disclosed; not independently verified this cycle
Poseidon Expeditions suits travelers who want maximum time ashore on a small ship and are comfortable with a single supplement for solo travel. It suits fewer people who want an all-inclusive fare or a ship large enough for a spa and multiple restaurants.
Poseidon Expeditions reviews: Sea Spirit passenger feedback
Sea Spirit reviews on Trustpilot and Cruise Critic consistently praise the expedition team: naturalists, geologists, and historians run daily lectures that reviewers describe as a highlight independent of weather. The 114-passenger size means Zodiac loading is fast and landings rarely feel crowded.
The recurring complaint splits along an onboard-vs-sales axis: onboard service draws few complaints, while sales and post-booking administration draw more, including refund timing. Poseidon also charges a single supplement, unlike three other operators here.
Oceanwide Expeditions Reviews: Older Ships, Lowest Fares
- Ships: Plancius, Hondius, Ortelius
- From: $8,200
- $/day: ~$700
- Rating: not disclosed this cycle
- Landing style: Two groups; Plancius's 8-guest overflow is a brief staggered departure
- HQ: Netherlands
- Gratuities: Not included
- Solo cabins: Sharing basis, no surcharge
Oceanwide suits budget-conscious travelers willing to accept older ships in exchange for the lowest per-day fare on this page and a no-surcharge solo option. It suits fewer people expecting new-build amenities or a large spa.
Oceanwide Expeditions reviews: older ships, lowest fares
Reviewers consistently describe Plancius and Ortelius as functional rather than luxurious: smaller cabins, older fixtures, and a no-frills dining room recur in critical reviews. Positive reviews cite the expedition staff and the price gap versus every other operator in Tier 1 and 2.
The Plancius's 108-passenger cap means it is one of the only ships on this page where the entire complement can go ashore at once under IAATO's 100-person limit, with an 8-guest overflow handled by staggered Zodiac departures.
What Quark Expeditions Reviews Say About Fly the Drake
- Ships: Quark's Ultramarine + 3 more
- From: $10,190
- $/day: ~$925
- Rating: not disclosed; not independently verified this cycle
- Landing style: Two groups, 76-99-guest overflow
- HQ: Seattle, USA
- Gratuities: Not included
- Fly option: Fly the Drake, same price band as sailing it
Quark suits travelers who most want to avoid the Drake Passage crossing and are willing to pay the same fare either way. It suits fewer people chasing the smallest possible ship.
What Quark Expeditions reviews say about Fly the Drake
Reviews of Quark's Ultramarine and Fly the Drake option are strongly positive on the expedition team and Zodiac operations; reviewers frequently mention returning for a second voyage. The most common critical note is cabin category value: reviewers booking lower categories report less favorable views than those in upper categories, a split not present in the same way on smaller ships.
Quark's 176-199 passenger range puts it at two landing rotations, the same band as the other Tier 2 ships and more than Tier 1's sub-150-passenger vessels.
Lindblad Expeditions Reviews: What Nat Geo Travelers Report
- Ships: NG Endurance, NG Resolution, NG Explorer
- From: $14,490 (12 days)
- $/day: ~$1,207
- Rating: not disclosed; not independently verified this cycle
- Landing style: Two groups, 26-48-guest overflow
- HQ: New York, USA
- Gratuities: Included in fare
- Partner: National Geographic
Lindblad suits travelers who want gratuities bundled into a single upfront price and National Geographic-affiliated programming. It suits fewer people optimizing for the lowest cost per day, which runs above every other Tier 1 operator here.
Lindblad Expeditions reviews: what Nat Geo travelers report
Positive reviews highlight the National Geographic photography and science programming and cite the all-inclusive fare as removing on-trip cost anxiety. Critical reviews we read most often raise per-day value: the roughly $1,200-per-day rate sits above every other Tier 1 operator here for a comparable 126-148 passenger ship. We have not yet assembled a large enough verified sample to characterize food sentiment for Lindblad specifically.
Lindblad's fleet sits at 126-148 passengers, keeping it in Tier 1 on landing access despite the higher fare, though with more rotation than Poseidon's smaller Sea Spirit.
Ponant Reviews: Le Commandant Charcot Passenger Feedback
- Ships: Le Commandant Charcot + 3
- From: $15,910
- $/day: ~$1,100-2,000+
- Rating: not disclosed this cycle
- Landing style: Two to three groups, 84-145-guest overflow
- HQ: France
- Ice class: Charcot is Polar Class 2, LNG hybrid
- Solo cabins: No supplement across 250+ voyages
Ponant suits travelers prioritizing hardware: Le Commandant Charcot is the only true polar-class icebreaker in commercial polar tourism. It suits fewer people optimizing for time ashore per guest, since its 184-245 passenger range means more rotation than Tier 1.
Ponant reviews: Le Commandant Charcot passenger feedback
Reviews of Le Commandant Charcot praise the ship itself: reviewers describe the icebreaking capability and reach into higher latitudes as unmatched, alongside a five-star onboard product (multiple restaurants, spa). Criticism centers on price relative to time ashore, since the larger passenger count means less landing time per guest than a 114 to 148-passenger ship at a comparable or lower fare.
Scenic Eclipse Antarctica Cruise Reviews
- Ships: Scenic Eclipse I / II
- From: $20,798
- $/day: ~$1,600-1,745
- Rating: not disclosed this cycle
- Landing style: Two groups, 100-guest overflow
- HQ: Australia
- Extras: Two helicopters, one submarine
- Gratuities: Included
Scenic suits travelers who want helicopter and submarine excursions bundled into an all-inclusive luxury fare. It suits fewer people shopping by price per day, the highest on this page.
Scenic Eclipse Antarctica cruise reviews
Reviews are strongly positive on the helicopter and submarine excursions, which reviewers describe as unavailable at this scale on any other operator here. The recurring complaint is availability: helicopter flights depend on weather and are not guaranteed despite the price, and a minority of reviewers describe this gap between marketing and delivery as the trip's biggest disappointment.
Silversea Antarctica Reviews: Silver Endeavour
- Ships: Silver Endeavour
- From: $15,400 (port-to-port)
- $/day: ~$1,850-2,300
- Rating: not disclosed this cycle
- Landing style: Two to three groups, 100-120-guest overflow
- HQ: Monaco
- Gratuities: Included
- No-Drake option: Antarctica Bridge flight
Silversea suits travelers who want to skip the Drake Passage entirely via its Antarctica Bridge charter flight. It suits fewer people optimizing for landing time per guest at its 200-220 passenger count.
Silversea Antarctica reviews: Silver Endeavour
Reviews consistently cite the Antarctica Bridge flight as the deciding factor for travelers who would otherwise skip an Antarctica cruise over seasickness concerns, alongside praise for the ship's all-suite layout. Complaints center on the same landing-time math as other 200-plus-passenger ships: two rotations per site means less time ashore per guest than Tier 1.
Hurtigruten (HX) Antarctica Reviews: What the Low Trustpilot Score Reflects
- Ships: Roald Amundsen, Fridtjof Nansen
- From: ~$8,995-10,927
- $/day: ~$780-910
- Rating: 2.8/5 (40 reviews, Trustpilot "HX Expeditions", Jul 2026)
- Landing style: Five groups, 390-400-guest overflow; four groups wait
- HQ: Norway
- Pax: 490-500 (just under the 500-pax landing threshold)
HX suits travelers prioritizing the lowest fare among Tier 3 ships. It suits fewer people who want more than a few landings per voyage, given its rotation count.
Hurtigruten (HX) Antarctica reviews: what the low Trustpilot score reflects
HX's Trustpilot score sits at 2.8 out of 5 from 40 reviews (Jul 2026), the lowest of any operator on this page with a verified public rating, though on the smallest verified sample of the ratings we could confirm. Reviews cite long rotation waits (about five per landing site at 490-500 passengers) and inconsistent excursion communication most often. HX's passenger count sits just under the 500-passenger threshold past which IAATO landings are prohibited entirely; see our landing rules page for why that number matters.
Holland America Antarctica Cruise Reviews: Scenic Cruising Only
- Ships: Zuiderdam, Oosterdam, Nieuw Amsterdam
- Pax: ~1,900+
- Rating: not disclosed this cycle
- Landing style: No landings permitted
- HQ: USA (Seattle)
- Departure: Only US departure port on this page (Fort Lauderdale, Miami)
Holland America suits travelers who want to see Antarctica from the ship without ever going ashore, at the largest scale on this page. It does not suit anyone whose goal is a landing, a Zodiac cruise, or a kayak excursion.
Holland America Antarctica cruise reviews: scenic cruising only
At roughly 1,900-plus passengers, Holland America's ships exceed IAATO's 500-passenger landing threshold by nearly 4x. Its 4-day "Antarctic Experience" is marketed as scenic cruising, and reviews reflect that framing accurately when read carefully: satisfied reviewers understood in advance that landings were never offered, while a minority of critical reviews describe having expected a landing that regulation never permitted this ship to make.
What Reviewers Consistently Praise and Complain About
These points recur across operators rather than belonging to any one company; each item names which pax band it tends to show up on.
Consistently praised
- Expedition team and lecture program; every pax band, most cited praise overall
- Number and length of landings; strongest on sub-150-passenger ships
- Wildlife encounters at close range: Gentoo, Chinstrap, and Adélie penguins, leopard and Weddell seals, humpback and minke whales
- Small-ship atmosphere and crew familiarity; under 150 passengers
- Kayaking and snowshoeing options; most common on Aurora, Poseidon, Oceanwide
Consistently criticized
- Drake Passage motion; all sailing-crossing operators, independent of ship size
- Rotation-based landings; 200-plus-passenger ships
- Inconsistent food and special-diet handling; reported across every pax band
- Advertised onboard facilities unavailable on a given voyage (helicopters, submarines); largest ships
- Refunds and a sales department disconnected from the onboard team; reported across every operator on this page, not isolated to one company
- Costs added on top of the headline fare; see the pricing table below
Small Ship vs. Large Ship: The 500-Passenger Rule
Under IAATO's implementation of ATCM Measure 15, a vessel carrying more than 500 passengers may not put anyone ashore in Antarctica. Below that threshold, no more than 100 people may be ashore at one landing site at once, at a guide-to-guest ratio of 1:20.
| Pax | Groups ceil(pax ÷ 100) | Overflow beyond the 100-person limit | Approx. time ashore per guest |
|---|---|---|---|
| 108-114 | 2 | 8-14 guests | Highest on this page |
| 126-199 | 2 | 26-99 guests | High |
| 200-245 | 2-3 | 100-145 guests | Moderate |
| 490-500 | 5 | 390-400 guests | Low |
| Over 500 | Landings prohibited | n/a | None |
This is why HX sits at 490-500 passengers rather than, say, 600: it is built to stay just under the landing threshold. It's also why Holland America sells its Antarctica sailing as a 4-day scenic cruise rather than an expedition: at roughly 1,900 passengers, landings are prohibited by regulation, not declined by choice. At the other end, Oceanwide's 108-passenger Plancius and Poseidon's 114-passenger Sea Spirit exceed the 100-person limit by only 8 and 14 guests respectively, the smallest overflow figures on this page. Both still split into two groups; the difference is that a group that size can be absorbed into Zodiac or kayak activity nearby rather than waiting for its turn. See the full breakdown, sourcing, and IAATO/ATCM citations on our Antarctica landing rules page.
Sail the Drake vs. Fly the Drake
Drake Passage motion is the single most common complaint across every operator on this page, which makes crossing type a decision axis rather than a footnote. Quark offers Fly the Drake at the same price band as sailing it. Silversea's Antarctica Bridge skips the Drake entirely via charter flight. Lindblad's Antarctica Direct offers a one-way flight option. Aurora and Lindblad both cite Ulstein's X-BOW hull design and Rolls-Royce stabilizers respectively as comfort features; treat these as operator claims tested against review sentiment, not as settled fact, since neither company publishes independent seasickness data.
What Is Not in the Price
This is where reviews get angriest across every operator, including Aurora and Poseidon.
| Operator | Gratuities | Single supplement | Flights to port |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aurora Expeditions | $15 pp/day, auto-added ($180 pp / 12 days), opt-out available | None; 10 solo cabins per voyage | Not included |
| Poseidon Expeditions | Not included | Charged | Not included |
| Oceanwide Expeditions | Not included | None; sharing basis | Not included |
| Ponant Explorations | Included | None across 250+ voyages | Not included |
| Lindblad Expeditions | Included | Charged | Not included |
| Scenic Luxury Cruises | Included | Charged | Not included |
| Silversea | Included | Charged | Not included |
We report this against Poseidon as plainly as for it: Poseidon does charge a single supplement, while Aurora, Oceanwide, and Ponant do not. Aurora's daily gratuity is disclosed and opt-out, which is more transparent than a mandatory service charge baked silently into the fare, but it is still an added cost worth budgeting for.
Aurora Expeditions Reviews: Frequently Asked Questions
Are Antarctica cruise reviews reliable?
Only partially. Reviewers often rate their sales/booking experience and their onboard voyage as one score, even though the two are handled by different departments and diverge in quality. Read the review text, not just the star rating, and check the sample size.
What do most negative Aurora Expeditions reviews mention?
Drake Passage motion, food consistency across a 12-day voyage, occasional unavailable advertised facilities, and refund or rebooking timing from the sales team rather than the onboard expedition staff.
Which operator has the best reviews for small groups?
Oceanwide's 108-passenger Plancius, Poseidon's 114-passenger Sea Spirit, and Aurora's 130-passenger ships all score well specifically on small-group atmosphere and landing access, by our stated landing-access criterion.
Do all Antarctica cruises actually land on the continent?
No. Ships carrying more than 500 passengers, like Holland America's roughly 1,900-passenger vessels, are prohibited from landing under IAATO's implementation of ATCM Measure 15, regardless of the operator's preference.
Does an Antarctica cruise include gratuities?
It depends on the operator. Lindblad, Scenic, Ponant, and Silversea include gratuities in the fare. Aurora auto-adds $15 per person per day with an opt-out. Poseidon and Oceanwide do not include gratuities.
Is it cheaper to fly the Drake or sail it?
With Quark, flying and sailing are priced in the same band, around $10,190 entry fare. Silversea's fly-only Antarctica Bridge starts higher, near $15,400, reflecting its larger all-suite ship rather than the flight itself.
How far ahead should I book?
12 to 18 months out for December to January departures. Solo cabins and specialist itineraries, like Aurora's camping add-on or Quark's Fly the Drake, tend to sell out 12 to 14 months in advance.
Which Operator Fits Your Priorities?
Select what matters most to you. This works without JavaScript; the matrix below always shows the full mapping.
| Priority | Operators to check first |
|---|---|
| Time ashore | Poseidon Expeditions, Oceanwide Expeditions, Aurora Expeditions |
| Lowest fare | Oceanwide Expeditions, HX, Quark Expeditions |
| No Drake crossing | Silversea, Quark Expeditions, Lindblad Expeditions |
| Activity breadth | Aurora Expeditions, Ponant Explorations, Scenic Luxury Cruises |
| All-in pricing | Lindblad Expeditions, Scenic Luxury Cruises, Ponant Explorations |